Final Portfolio

Table of Contents

Introduction: My Outlook of English 1010……………………………………………Page 3

Evaluation Movie Review: Halloween………………………………………………..Page 5

Reflection: The Day I Almost Died……………………………………………………Page 8

Analysis: Meatless Like Me……………………………………………………………Page 12

Research: Does Divorce Bring Negative Consequences?……………………………………….Page 15

Works Cited…………………………………………………………………………….Page 21

My Outlook of  English 1010

As I began the Introduction to Writing Class I realized how much things have changed. I

have not been in an English class since 1989.  Things were definitely a lot different back then.

the way things were cited then is definitely different. I had never even heard of MLA format.

This class has taught me a lot. I cannot say I am a pro at any of it though. I could probably take

this class ten more times and still have things I don’t understand.

In the evaluation paper I chose to write a movie review. I chose to review Halloween by

Rob Zombie. I love scary movies and have watched it a dozen times before. Although I did see it

so many times I found the assignment a little difficult.  I ended up writing more about the story

line rather than the feelings and ideas of the movie. I never had paid attention to the genre which

is definitely a slasher film audience.

For the reflection paper I wrote about a scary time in my life. I found the thesis hard to

come up with. I figured it would be an easy paper to write. It was my easiest out of the four. It

still wasn’t easy though.

The analysis draft I wrote out of Readings for Writers was difficult too. This is when I

discovered I didn’t know how to cite at all.

Finally the research paper I chose, it was a topic that was very personal to me. I

researched facts, findings and opinions. I checked out 11 books from the local library and went

onto many websites. Even with all the information I gathered I still had a hard time writing this

paper. I couldn’t quite decide on the thesis statement. Once I finally figured it out I couldn’t

figure out how to write an argumentative paper. It turned out to be more persuasive. I didn’t

really know how to change it either.

With each paper I searched the internet to find explanations on what everything meant in

regards on how to write the paper. I am definitely behind the times. I still don’t understand

Rhetorical sensitivity, Ethos, Logos or Pathos very well at all. I get all of them mixed up. If

someone asked I would even have to look up the definition of each. That ages me, my

memory is going.

Before I began each paper I had a notebook in hand. I jotted down different ideas and

anything that came to mine. I also wrote down notes from the weekly chats. I read the example

drafts and made some notes from those also. I researched a lot on the internet too. Then I began

writing, then I rewrote a few more times. Finally I got everything written how I wanted it and I

submitted my papers.

Although I have found a lot of things in this class difficult I think it really has helped the

way I write. I seem to be more conscious about how I write.

Movie Review: “ Halloween” Directed and Written by Rob Zombie

This movie is set in Haddonfield, Illinois where Michael Myers committed his first

murders. Rob Zombie remade this classic horror film in 2007, it was originally written by

John Carpenter in 1978. Zombie reveals Michael Myers childhood which we have never seen

before in such detail. Carpenter never showed just how bad his childhood was. Carpenters movie

is basically about a mental patient who escapes and is stalking and killing babysitters. Zombies

movie is focused on Michael, we see what made Michael a psychopath. Zombie did change the

ending completely. It seemed as though the ending was rushed where the beginning really drug

on for at least 45 minutes. We learn a lot about the characters in the beginning but the characters

towards the end of the movie we don’t know much about. We do see the terrible childhood

Michael had. Daeg Faerch that plays Michael as a ten year old boy does an awesome job

portraying this boy in a dysfunctional family, you feel sorry for him. Then as Tyler Mane

plays the adult Michael Myers he takes the character to an evil side. Malcom McDowell

plays Dr. Sam Loomis, the psychiatrist for Michael. Scout Taylor-Compton plays the

character of Laurie Strode, Michaels baby sister, now a teenager. The movie begins with

Michael as a 10 year old boy. His family includes his mother, his mothers’ boyfriend and two

sisters. The mothers’ boyfriend is a dead beat that is shown drinking and verbally abusing

everyone in the home. The mother played by Sheri Moon Zombie is a kind hearted women that

is a stripper at the local strip club. His older sister is disobedient and ignores her family.  The

baby sister, Michael really loves and is very gentle with her. You really can’t help but feel

sympathy for this family throughout the entire movie. The movie depicts them as a white

trash family, the mother has a dead beat boyfriend, a daughter going nowhere, a dead end job

and a son who is a killer. Michael is returning to Haddonfield 17 years after he was committed

to a mental institution where he has escaped. The reason for his return is to find his baby sister,


Zombies movie shows what Carpenters Halloween originally did, Dr. Loomis trying to

understand Michael. Why is he so angry? Loomis visits Michael in the Psychiatric ward and is

at a loss with him. Michael doesn’t remember what happened, what he did to his family. He

always asks his mother how the other family members are. Zombie shows that there is a definite

psychological problem there. Michael begins making masks to cover his “ugliness”, he is

obsessed with making masks and he starts talking less and less. In Zombies movie we learn why

Michael wears the mask and why he doesn’t speak. Carpenter never filled us in on those details,

he left that as a mystery. We could draw many conclusions.

Zombie does leave us with many questions, Why is Michael a giant in this movie? How

does he find and even know who his baby sister is, after all she was a baby when he got locked

up. Michael killed people that were mean to him, why does the killing change as an adult?

The 1978 Carpenter movie Laurie(Michaels baby sister) is shown as a heroine, Zombie

shows her as a victim. Rob Zombie does include many of the scenes and lines from the original

movie. Some of the original music is also used. The new music doesn’t seem to fit the movie.

This is a slasher film, there is a lot of cursing and sexual references so definitely for

adults only! I believe Zombie does this to show just how bad Michaels childhood was. I don’t

think it is all necessary to show how troubled the boy is. It does show a lot of negativity that

Michael was always around. This movie has a lot of blood and gore. If you like slasher films and

don’t mind all the cursing and sex this is great for you. Unfortunately this movie does not have

as much suspense as the original. You are expecting each event. There is not really a climax

either. After Michael escapes the mental institution it is basically one murder after another.

I personally love the Halloween movies and have since I was a teenager. I never dreamed

anyone could pull off a remake but Rob Zombie does a fabulous job. I was on the edge of my

seat gritting my teeth. Mostly to see who would get it next!

I read some of the facts about the movie on Wikepedia that I will share. June 4, 2006

Rob Zombie announced he was remaking Halloween. John Carpenter and he are friends so they

Spoke about it and John said, “Make it your own.” The movie was released August 31, 2007.

The film cost $15 million to make and grossed $80, 208,039 at the box offices worldwide.

The 1978 film of John Carpenters had a budget of $325, 000 and grossed $47

Million at the box office in the United States, and $70 million worldwide. (

The Day I Almost Died

June 3, 1998 was a day that my life changed. I had been unable to keep food or liquids

down for ten days. I had made numerous visits to the emergency room and I was told every time

that there was no medical reason I was ill. My doctor actually went as far as to say, “its all in

your head.” I was shocked, I knew something was wrong, I had only been this ill when I was

pregnant and I wasn’t. I was shaking I was so angry that the doctor would say such a thing. I

could feel in my gut something was seriously wrong, how dare he say it was all in my head.

I shouldn’t have been so surprised since men always think women are overreacting.

On the evening of June 2 I got up in the middle of the night to get a drink from the

kitchen. As I stood up the entire room was spinning, I felt like I just got off the teacups at

Lagoon. My body was sweaty and I felt like I was on fire. I was weak and shaky, as I took

a few steps I passed out. I woke up on the floor. I don’t know how long I had laid there. I

tried yelling for my husband. I was weak, I hardly had a voice. All that came out was a

whisper, “Are you awake?” I don’t know if I fell asleep or passed out again. When I woke up

the second time the sun was out. I knew my husband would be awake and getting ready for

work, he would find me on the floor. Finally, which seemed like hours he found me and helped

me onto the couch. He was ready to leave for work, as he started to leave, I said to him, “Are

you just going to leave me here?” His response was in a high pitched, no big deal tone, “What

do you want me to do, the doctor said, “its all in your head.” As I cried, I asked him to take

our three children, who were 7, 5 and 3 to their grandmothers. He angrily got them ready,

cussing under his breath that I should quit faking and watch our kids.  As him and our children

went out the door I stated, “When you get home from work, I will be dead.” After all the

accusations of me being over dramatic he called the doctor. We dropped our children off to

Grandma and headed to the doctors office. After arriving at the doctors office I was told I

would be admitted to the hospital for dehydration. I had made numerous emergency room

visits over the last ten days so was relieved that finally something was going to be done. I

felt relief, I sighed,  I was hopeful the doctors would figure out what was wrong. I was

admitted around 8:30am, I changed into a gown, got into bed and the nurse came in to

start and IV. Over the proceeding hour a few nurses and nursing assistants came into check

my vital signs. After my blood pressure was taken the first time I asked the nurse, “what is it?”

She ignored my question and said she would be right back. I didn’t understand, don’t I have a

right to know? A few minutes later a different nurse came in, again she took my blood pressure

and again I asked, “what is it?” The nurse said their machine was not working and she would go

get another one. A few moments later two nurses with a new machine came in. I thought, “I

do it the old fashioned way why don’t you?” My blood pressure was taken again and again I

asked. She left the room, my heart was racing and I was shaking I was so angry I could feel

my face turning red. I over heard the nurse on the phone. “No doctor, I cannot find a pulse…..

well of course she must have one, she is talking…..” I didn’t hear anything after that, I had a

sick feeling in my stomach,” something is really wrong”, I thought. The nurse returned and

explained the highest reading the blood pressure machine was getting was 50/10, they could

not find my pulse and my heart rate was 140BPM. My thoughts were all over the place, I was

a licensed Nursing Assistant and I knew this was all bad news. The nurse told me the doctor said

he would be in soon. Trying to wait patiently, sweaty and shaky a phlebotomist walked in at

10am. He did a blood draw, so many things were going through my mind, one of course was,

“How are my kids going to be without me?”

After the nurse calling the doctor numerous times he showed up at 2pm. He came in

and said, “I need to transfer you to University Hospital in Salt Lake.” My heart was pounding,

I was barely able to move I was so scared. He explained that I would be seeing an oncologist.

“Oh great”, I thought. “I knew I had cancer and this idiot said,” it’s all in my head”. Thankfully

after my anger subsided I was told he was a hematologist and they had not found cancer but that

my blood count was crazy.

I was told I could go by ambulance, my husband could drive me or I could go by Life

Flight. “Did I need Life Flight?”, I thought to myself. After a lot of questions I felt going by

Ambulance, although I was worried I felt safe doing that.

My husband had went to work after I was admitted to the hospital so I had to locate him.

I called his office and left a message with his secretary. Frantically I started dialing family

members and asked them to please find him. I remember being loaded into the ambulance, I

remember speaking to the EMT’s and I remember the rain hitting the sides of the ambulance.

The next thing I remember was waking up and my neck felt stiff and the hospital bed was

tipped up so my head was pointing to the floor. My room was dark, I could hear someone crying

quietly. I tried turning my head, I discovered I had a main line IV in my neck that blood was

pumping into. I tried to call to the person that I could hear, my voice was still a whisper. I made

some movement and my husband ran over crying. I said, “What happened?” He told me how I

went unconscious and they had found a bleeding ulcer that they had to cauterize. I had lost four

units of blood and that was why I was getting a blood transfusion. My appendix had ruptured and

I had had to have my gall bladder removed because it was so inflamed. I was thankful to be alive

at this point. My smart alec side said in a very angry whisper, “I told you if you left me at home

this morning I would be dead when you got home.” My husband said, “Cheryl that was three

days ago.”  In the next few days I had to have an emergency hysterectomy. I could have left my

children motherless. If I had not been admitted for dehydration I would be dead. If I had not

been sent to this specialist my family would have been left without me. I learned that I had

Von Willebrands, this is a blood disorder similar to a hemophiliac. I had cysts on my ovaries

which were bleeding. Thankful the worst was behind me and greatful to be alive I didn’t have

a care in the world. The doctor said when I arrived at the hospital they could not get a blood

pressure, a pulse or a heart rate, I was presumed dead. They revived me and got me into surgery.

What they found was that I was drowning in my own blood. My stomach was pooled with four

units of blood, they drained it and gave me a transfusion, over the next couple days I had to have

more transfusions.

I knew I was going to die that day, I am relieved that I am still here, I was able to raise

my children and have grandchildren. I am very glad for the doctors who revived me and took

such good care of me. From that day on I NEVER have let a doctor tell myself or anyone else,

“its all in your head.” I ignore that comment and fight with every breath to get medical attention.

“Meatless like Me”

In “Meatless like Me”, Taylor Clark talks about vegetarians and the way people react to

vegetarians. Clark explains that vegetarians are no different than someone who eats meat.

Vegans however are those who avoid animal products all together.

Clark is a herbivore and is speaking to those omnivores that find him anything but

“normal”. Clark explains to his readers that he and other vegetarians are normal. He tells this

with quite a bit of humor (Clark pg. 74).

Clark appeals to his readers when he gives a description of the first time that people

made a big deal of him being a vegetarian. He draws you in with the detail so you understand

exactly how he felt.  He explains how he had succeeded in showing everyone at a scholarship

luncheon what a responsible young man he was. He is very descriptive in everything he says. It

makes you feel like you are there in the room with him. Clark said after being asked why he

hadn’t taken any meat from the buffet table, “30 people went eerily quiet, undoubtedly expecting

me to launch into a speech on the virtues of hemp” (Clark Pg. 73)

Clark explains to his readers what a vegetarian is and why people are vegetarians. He

tells his readers’ to imagine a normal person with normal food cravings with a broad range of

friends and enjoys a good time. He then says “remove from this persons’ diet, anything that once

had eyes” (Clark pg.74). So basically he has a very logical explanation. Everyone can imagine

what a vegetarian is, no questions asked with his definition.  Clark goes onto explain differences

in vegetarians. He says people who eat chicken and fish are still omnivores. Vegans are those

who avoid all animal products.  Vegetarians are those who do not consume any meat and eat

vegetables, tofu and other herbal foods (Clark pg. 74).

Clark lays out on the line how omnivores act and how silly they actually sound

when asking questions like, “Will we panic if confronted with a hamburger?” His explanations

of the way people react and the things people say are hilarious. It actually makes you want to

hear more. Clark uses pathos to appeal to his readers, “ prompting everyone in earshot to stare at

him as if he just revealed plans to sail his carrot-powered plasma yacht to Neptune” (Clark

pg.74) It was exciting to read on afterthat point.

Taylor Clark also talks about how thoughtful and how thoughtless some people are in

regards to vegetarians. He tells his readers how he doesn’t want to hear about vegetarians doing

something wrong.  He lets you know if you want to talk about it great, if not don’t insult him


Clark explains why vegetarians gave up meat, he shows this through logos. He states

“Vegetarians give up meat for a variety of ethical, environmental, and health reasons “.  He

explains That it is not that they believe meat doesn’t taste good, its slaughtering the animals that

bother them. He goes on to say that is “why there’s a freezer case at your supermarket full of

woefully inadequate meat substitutes” (Clark pg.  75)

Taylor is very sarcastic in his writings. He states, “I’m not exactly St. Francis of Assisi

over here, tenderly ministering to every chipmunk that crosses my path” (Clark pg. 76). Then

says “take a look at my shoes-they’re made of leather, which I am told by those with expert

knowledge of the tanning process, comes  from dead cows” (Clark pg. 76) He says he is accused

of hypocrisy and says, “Hey, you try and find a pair of non leather dress shoes” (Clark pg. 76).

Taylor Clark is very entertaining. His sarcasm is quite enjoyable.  Clark does a good job

of supporting his arguments and does it in a humorous way to get readers to keep reading. Clarks

writing has informal fallacies. Like when he says “few herbivores go one step further and avoid

all animal products-milk, eggs, honey, leather-and they call themselves vegan”(Clark pg. 74).

Does Divorce Bring Negative Consequences?

A. Dean Byrd explains about negative things parents say to their children. It seems

children are the ones who suffer the most from negative effects in divorce. Byrd describes many

negative things that parents say and do. He said, parents say things like “you are just like your

mother” or “you are just like your father”. (128) The other thing ex-spouses do is blame

everything on the divorce. (128) Putting your child in the middle by passing messages to your

former spouse through them. Byrd says, “Don’t try to protect your children from consequences

of divorce”. He says to include them in decisions. (129)

Wallerstein and Blakeslee, Second Chances said that “the quality of the mother-child

relationship is the singles most critical factor in determining how children feel about themselves

in the post-divorce decade and how well they function in the various domains of their


On Kathleen O’Connell Corcoran gives many statistics. The following

are a few of them. Fifty percent of marriages end in divorce. The United States has the highest

divorce rate. Sixty-seven percent of second marriages end in divorce. These rates are terribly

high, but from 2005 these rates have gone down. An interesting statistic is that women initiate

divorce twice as often as men. Women experience less stress and adjust better than men after a

divorce. Women tend to have more of a support group than men do with family and friends. Men

remarry more quickly than women. Men are more negative about divorce and spend more

energy attempting to salvage the marriage. (Corcoran)

Paul R. Amato and Denise Previti used a national panel data collection and gave the

following reasons for divorce, the most common is infidelity, incompatibility, drinking, drug

use and just growing apart.

The United States Census shows that the divorce rate is lower now than it was in 1990.

Out of 2,230,000 marriages, the divorce rate was 3.6% per 1000 people. The highest rate was in

1981 at a rate of 5.3%. Nevada had the highest divorce rate than any other state, while

Massachusetts had the lowest. Some sources say the divorce rates may go down, only because

people are becoming more likely to live together than marry. Divorce (DS)) also

say if you are over the age of 30 when you marry the percentage of divorce rate goes down. The

highest percentage is of men and women between the age of 20-24 years old. (DSO) In

Utah in 1990 the divorce rate per 1000 people was 5.1% and in 2010 went down to 3.7%. Second

marriages have a 60-67% divorce rate and third marriages have a 70-73% divorce rate. Couples

who do not have children have a higher divorce rate than childless couples. After a divorce

men generally wait 3.3 years to remarry, women wait 3.1 years. (DSO) Divorce in

the United States is highest in the world. (MO) In 1980 interracial couples had the

highest divorce rate, the highest was between white females and non-white males. In 2002 the

percentage of couples who reached their 5th anniversary was 82% but, the percentage of those

that reached 15 years went down to 52%. (DSO)

Guy M. Galli says, Divorce is generally not a “win-win” relationship. When couples have

children with their former spouse “win-win” in not usually the case. (37) When there are

conflicts there is always those “win-lose” circumstances where each person in the relationship

tend to fight hard and dirty. Galli says, couples will “pull no punches” to win everything,

children and belongings alike.(38) He also says there is a “lose-win”, this is where one spouse

gives in and gives the other person whatever they want and and are basically a doormat. (38)

Then there is also the “lose-lose” situation. How can both parents lose? Galli explains, this is

when the one parent has visitation of the child and that parent wants to go on vacation, out of

town or on a date but doesn’t let the other parent watch the child.(38)

In the book “After Divorce” S. Brent Scharman has written a chapter titled, “LDS

Men and Divorce”. Scharman states, “Two of the most common though contradictory

stereotypes about divorce are that it opens the door to a life of poverty and deprivation for

the wife and children and that the husband becomes the fulfillment of the sentiments of the

country song, “She got the gold mine and I got the shaft”. “ (81) In this chapter it explains that

studies show women are worse off financially after divorce. It also says women may be happier

having control over the limited resources they do have. (81)

Kristin Armstrong wrote a 365 daily devotional book. It is called “Happily Ever After”,

“Walking with Peace and Courage Through a Year of Divorce.” Day 2 of this book is called,

“Choosing Your Path”. In a portion of this Armstrong explains how it is imperative to recognize

the significance of healing. She states, “This choice not only affects you, but it can also shape the

legacy you leave for your children and grandchildren. The path of sour bitterness, crusty

resentment, and cold regret breeds generations of despair.”

Andrew J. Cherlin wrote a book called “The Marriage Go Around”, “The State of

Marriage and the Family in America Today”. This book talks about marriage and divorce

in different countries and cultures. In this book it talks about a national survey that was given

to Americans, they were asked if they agreed or disagreed with the following statement:

“Marriage is a lifetime relationship that should never be ended except under extreme

circumstances.”, said Cherlin. Only 11 percent said they disagreed and 13 percent neither agreed

or disagreed. Although when people marry they intend for their marriage to last forever. (25)

Divorce generally effects children more than it effects the adults. Children feel as if its

their fault and they are used as leverage to the other parent.

Shelley Stile talks about the negative emotions and thoughts that people hold onto that

stops them from moving on with their lives. She says anger, sadness, depression, rage, grief,

resentment, bitterness and confusion are some of the feelings divorcing couples experience.

After a divorce is finalized there is a new way of life and sometimes it gets lonely.

Even the person who initiated the divorce have these feelings, everyones life has changed. If

resentment and hatred is what is thought about daily lives can’t go on. ( Stile

lists eleven items that help divorced people let go of bad thoughts and emotions. The first is life

is precious and it needs to be made great. Second, only you are responsible for your life. Third,

learn how to grow and not live in the past. Fourth, everything happens for a reason. Fifth, It is

not what happens in life, its how a person handles it that matters. Sixth, don’t spend your life

asking what should have been. Seventh, separate facts from drama. Eighth, “Don’t let the mind

chatter run the show because you will forever stay stuck.” Ninth, Learn to forgive. Tenth, Fall in

love with yourself and honor yourself. Eleventh, you have control of one thing that is yourself.

Price and McKenry said that there are some influential reasons that there has been such

a change in the divorce rate from earlier times. Economic conditions, the rise of feminism, and

reform of divorce laws. They also said the “wars made women indispensable to the workforce.

Since these things happened women became more independent, more assertive, they started

getting an education, became part of the workforce, had fewer children and fought for equal

rights. Hetherington and Arasteh have said that divorce is not the beginning of turmoil its been

apart of their daily lives for a while.

The California Children of Divorce Project was started in 1971 and ended in 1981.

Sixty divorced families were in the study. There was an interview at 18 months, 5 years and

10 years after the divorce. Nine families were referred to psychologists so they were not

included in the study which left fifty-two families. The responses from the children were based

on general and separation anxiety, sleep patterns and anger. The younger children were more

affected but there was not a noticeable difference in gender. Eighteen months into the study

boys were showing difficulty in sleeping. At five years the “strong correlation between the

psychological adjustment and the overall healthiness of the family life after the divorce was

the best predictor of the attitudes and behaviors of the children.” After 10 years, the majority

of the children recalled negative images of their parents split up and felt deprived of a normal

childhood. The young women had a fear of betrayal and attachment, but they still believed

they could have a happy marriage. (TCCDP)

These days divorce is so lenient that society is more accepting of the idea. Researchers

say that there is an “entirely new generation” of children to study. Over the last 10 years the

negative effects on children have been delayed social maturation, the sleeper effect, the

increased likelihood of marital instability and lower levels of academic achievement.

Researchers want to know about these effects for children’s studies to ensure proper

interventions are established so families can cope with stressful events. (Price and McKenry)

Harper Book of America Quotations stated, “So many persons think divorce a panacea

(cure-all) for every ill, find out, when they try it, that the remedy is worse than the disease.”

After reading all the facts and findings from researchers and other sources, Does Divorce

Bring Negative Consequences? My sources say yes!

Works cited:

Armstrong, Kristin “Happily Ever After Walking with Peace and Courage Through a Year of Divorce “

New York January 2007. Print.

Byrd, A. Dean” Finding Wholeness and Happiness After Divorce “ Utah 1948. Print.

Cherlin, Andrew J. “The Marriage-Go-Round The State of Marriage and Family in Amercia Today”

New York 2009. Print.

Galli, Guy M. B.S., Pruden, David C. M.S. “When Forever Doesn’t Last A healing Journey Through

Divorce “ Utah. 2010. Print.

Price, Sharon J., Mckenry, Patrick C. “Divorce” Newbury Park, California. 1988. Print.

Aramato, Paul R., Previti, Denise”Peoples Reasons for Divorcing: Gender, Social Class,

The Life Course and Adjustment” Pennsylvania State

University, 5 July 2003. Web. 14 Nov. 2012

Corcoran, Kathleen O’Connell “Psychological and Emotional Aspects of Divorce”, June 1997. Web. 15 Nov. 2012

Stile, Shelley “Divorce Recovery:Releasing the Toxic Emotions”

American Divorce Information Network 17 Jan.2012 Web. 11 Nov. 2012

Americans for Divorce Reform “Divorce Statistics” Discover Channel

2010. Web. 12 Nov. 2012

FastStats Center for Disease Control and Prevention 27 Aug. 2010. Web. 11 Nov. 2012

Wallerstein, Judith S. and Blakeslee, Sandra , “Second Chances”, Corgi 1 January, 1990

Clark, Taylor, “Meatless like Me”, Readings for Writers, Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2012


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s